May 12th
On this day, forty-one years ago, Dad was gone.
It took, of course, years for everyone - and that included his large circle of friends and family, with him in the centre, a larger-than-life gregarious, humourous figure- to accept his absence with a sort of detached equanimity. In modern language, with its epithets and attempts at neat labels, it is often termed ‘closure’, but it never is, if the memory wishes it to remain, often preserved in the sepia of an old photograph and those conversations that begin with, ‘If Vasu were here…..’
When the drumbeats of war shook us up this early May and the memes, messages and meandering underscored the restlessness of anxiety, I thought of him and, of course, I have thought of him today too.
For he had faced conflict far more often than any of us who read this will have: twenty-five years old and returning from his day’s work in a train in the summer of 1947, with bodies of victims bearing the scars of conflict on both sides of that metre gauge track; being asked, at the age of forty, to drop his wife to an air field to be evacuated, while the men stayed back to face the possibility of a Chinese invasion that was reportedly hours away and, after which, the family would be gone forever; a 1965 war and another one in 1971, of which I have a dim memory of a darkened home, hooded headlights and a mum who had endured another sleepless night.
It wasn’t just him, of course, most men and women of his generation had heard those drumbeats roll, their echoes a distant ominous portent, the beats conflating with those of the heart, so there was consolation in knowing that others were in the same boat on a turbulent river. But little else. Each such conflagration brought forth the likelihood of never seeing his beloved Palakkad again, with its palms and paddy and politics, and his family, particularly his grandmother, my mutashi, who was his life (and I have often wondered what she had gone through in her ninety-eight years, but all I remember is a fetching toothless smile, a hanging earlobe and that half-bent body).
He loved Nehru, admired Mrs Gandhi and hated Nixon and he loved the idea of India above all else, for he had lived with it all his adult life. That emotion extended to idealism, perhaps even quixotic idealism, with decency and kindness at its core. I know he hated war because there is never a winner and he had seen enough of it. He hated war for its consequences on simple, ordinary people who are the ants scurrying out of a battlefield of two raging deranged tuskers. I know he hated war above anything else because his father, Dada, had been an officer in the British Army in the Second World War and a continuance of that tradition is taken for granted in the Nair community, with its history and pride and affirmation of battle.
But it was, for Dad, never an option, partly because his grandmother took a promise from him that he wouldn’t fight and partly because of his idealism and resolution. No, war was never an option: the armed forces were there as the crucial institution for defence, not aggression, a view that he had learnt from listening to Nehru, reading the Mahatma and those insightful books about partition, all of which formed his pacifist view where peace was the central tenet of human existence. This meant that he was liberal too and could live comfortably with those who disagreed, as Major VR Menon, his best friend did, but those views of his would never change.
Today, I think of those views - which are mine too - and realise, with some solace, that I remember Dad for much more than any gift he had given me. Idealism and kindness can be preserved in sepia too.
 |
The Fab Four: Uncles Sawant, Rathnam, Vish and Dad. They saw it all. And they were kind and idealistic. |